When it comes to the world of DanMachi, there are many characters that spark conversations among fans. One such character is Hermes, the god of commerce and trickery. While Hermes may seem like a charming and affable character at first glance, there are those who believe that he may actually be a villain in disguise.
One of the reasons why some fans consider Hermes to be a villain is due to his manipulative nature. Throughout the series, Hermes has been shown to be someone who is willing to do whatever it takes to achieve his goals, even if it means manipulating others. This has been demonstrated through his actions towards Bell Cranel, the series’ protagonist.
Despite appearing friendly towards Bell on multiple occasions, some argue that Hermes has ulterior motives for getting close to him. They believe that he is using Bell as a pawn in his own schemes and is only interested in him because of his unique abilities as an adventurer.
Another reason why some fans view Hermes as a potential villain is due to his involvement with the Apollo Familia. In the series, Apollo is portrayed as one of the main antagonists and someone who is willing to go to great lengths to achieve his goals. As a member of Apollo’s Familia, some believe that this association makes Hermes complicit in Apollo’s actions and therefore just as guilty.
However, despite these suspicions, there are those who argue that Hermes may not necessarily be a villain but instead a morally ambiguous character. They point out that while he may have questionable motives at times, he also has moments where he shows genuine concern for others.
Regardless of where you stand on this debate, there’s no denying that Hermes is one of the most interesting characters in DanMachi. Whether he’s a hero or villain remains up for interpretation and will likely continue to spark debates among fans for years to come.
In conclusion, while some fans consider Hermes from DanMachi as a potential villain due to his manipulative nature and involvement with Apollo’s familia, others argue that he is a morally ambiguous character who shows genuine concern for others. Ultimately, it’s up to each individual viewer to decide where they stand on this debate.